Overview

Window Jan 2025 onward Data through 2026-08-04 ramp-up excluded automatically coverage by business days reached (US federal holidays excluded)

$67,754 a year is recoverable from how buying is done

Against $1,620,407 of annual purchasing. The fastest returns are below.

Recoverable per year $67,754
4.2% of annual spend
Annual run-rate $3,213,382
spend/year at the current pace
Received, not invoiced $2,111,535
1,968 lines with goods in and no invoice
Largest vendor share 42.9%
Insight
Where things stand

Every question at a glance

Across all sections

What needs attention most

65.4% of open lines are past their promised date

70 lines worth $175,583 were promised by a date that has passed by more than the 14-day grace period. Either the goods are late and nobody is chasing, or they arrived and the receipt was never recorded — and the two need different fixes.

$2,111,535 of received goods carry no invoice

Only 16.2% of received lines have been invoiced, against a target of 80%. Every uninvoiced line is a liability the organisation has incurred and not recorded — the accrual lands eventually, and the longer the gap the less likely anyone can still check what was actually delivered against what is billed.

27 open lines were ordered more than 90 days ago

$49,247 committed on orders that have not arrived in three months. At that age the realistic split is between orders that were quietly cancelled and orders that arrived without anyone recording the receipt — and both need closing out rather than leaving on the book.

1 past month does not reach month end

May 2026 (16/20 business days) — the export stops short, so that month is projected from the business days present rather than compared as measured. Re-exporting would firm up every trend on this page.

affects trend accuracySee the orders →

Only 49.9% of lines carry a spend classification

Category analysis — and any sourcing strategy built on it — covers 239 of 479 lines. The rest cannot be assigned to a category at all, so the category shares below describe the classified subset, not total spend.

50% unclassifiedSee the orders →

$117,507 paid above the best price already achieved

106 items were bought more than once from the same vendor at more than one price. The largest single gap is 46004.1AEE6 from Zoho Corporation (Manage Engine): $18,872.00 at best against $52,774.00 at worst across 2 purchases. This is an upper bound on what tighter buying could have saved, not a forecast that it would have.

Spend

Monthly purchasing

Open Spend →

Goods value ordered per month

May 2026 projected from 16 of 20 business days (59,900 -> 74,875); Aug 2026 excluded — data reaches only 2 of 21 business days

Show the numbers
MonthSpendBasis
Jan 2025$92,076Measured
Feb 2025$131,501Measured
Mar 2025$78,739Measured
Apr 2025$53,481Measured
May 2025$106,485Measured
Jun 2025$53,963Measured
Jul 2025$174,991Measured
Aug 2025$176,190Measured
Sep 2025$180,624Measured
Oct 2025$85,686Measured
Nov 2025$56,594Measured
Dec 2025$158,042Measured
Jan 2026$75,160Measured
Feb 2026$145,876Measured
Mar 2026$97,060Measured
Apr 2026$294,300Measured
May 2026$74,875Projected from partial data
Jun 2026$341,520Measured
Jul 2026$167,526Measured
Aug 2026$212,496Forecast
Sep 2026$220,421Forecast
Oct 2026$228,346Forecast
Recommended

Highest-value next steps

  1. Fix contracted prices on the top ten repeat items

    They account for $90,824 of the $117,507 measured variance. The purchase history below is the negotiating evidence.

    Low effort$45,412Open →
  2. Hold same-vendor orders for a daily release

    265 vendor-days carried more than one order. A once-a-day release per vendor removes 1,074 orders of paperwork without delaying anything by more than hours.

    Low effort$43,175Open →
  3. Run a three-way match on the unbilled balance

    1,968 received lines worth $2,111,535 have no invoice. Matching order to receipt to invoice, largest vendor first, converts an unknown accrual into a known one.

    Medium effort$2,111,535Open →
  4. Set contracted prices on the top repeat items

    106 items were bought repeatedly at different prices from the same vendor. Fixing the price on the top ten alone addresses $90,824 of the measured variance.

    Low effort$117,507Open →